Atheist's Attacks

Answering Humanist's Accusations Against the Bible

Christian Resources

Humanist Hypocricy

Do Humanists Practice What They Preach?

I'm going to take a break from looking at humanist accusations against the Bible to take a rational and logical look at the trustworthiness of what the humanists claim. Do they actually practice what they preach? The answer is no. Here are some quotes from their web site:

The AHA considers the integrity of scientific knowledge to be essen-tial to a humanist society. For that reason, we insist that scientific studies that have been peer-reviewed and reproduced in accordance with the highest standards be the sole basis for public policy and ed-ucation. Religious or sectarian doctrine is irrelevant and immaterial to discerning the best policy. https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/human-basis-laws-ethics/

Humanism is a rational philosophy informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by compassion. https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/definition-of-humanism/

What I take this to mean is that, what is taught in schools and the “facts” on which we base how we live, should be based on scientific truths. To be sure we’ve got it right, let’s take a further look at what humanists say they believe. Let’s start with what should be an easy one, murder. From what I can tell they are against it. I was able to find four statements on their web site similar to the following:

The American Humanist Association expresses sorrow and outrage that the lives of those who would criticize extremist religion are still in danger. – www.tinyurl.com/ydys27oc

I assume that, because they are outraged when a humanist faces threats of being murdered, they are against the premeditated taking of a human life. Also, their accusations against God for supposedly taking the lives of babies’ leads me to assume they are against the premeditated murder of babies. Now let’s read their official position on murdering babies.

We condemn all forms of gender-based violence, restrictions on women’s reproductive choices. https://americanhumanist.org/ key-issues/womens-rights/

The AHA supports every woman’s unequivocal moral and legal right to autonomy over her own body and reproductive choices. Women’s access to family planning, contraception, birth control, emergency contraception, and healthcare services and resources should be un-restricted by the government or religious preferences of private third parties. Local, state, or federal initiatives designed to undermine the landmark Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade violate the individu-al’s human right to pursue all reproductive options.

The AHA will continue to advocate for every woman’s full exercise of her right to decide if and when to safely become a mother. Broader access to sex education (not limited to abstinence-only programs), all safe forms of contraception, and full-service healthcare options are essential policies to realizing that right…. Scientific advances provide significant choices for reproductive health, including abortion, and re-ligious pressure must never impede full access to those resources. https://americanhumanist.org/key-issues/reproductive-freedom/

It is clear that humanists not only support abortion, but they feel it is a woman’s right, and they credit scientific advances for the wide range of choices a woman has for getting an abortion. Based on these quotes, I assume this support for abortion is based a rational philosophy informed by science and motivated by compassion.

What does science say about a baby in the womb? The scientific experts (embryologists) overwhelming say that a baby is a unique human being from the moment of conception. That is the established scientific fact. Let’s go to the Princeton University web site and the “International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy” (February 1999, 19:3/4:22-36) A paper published in this journal, written by Dr. Dianne N. Irving, is titled “When Do Human Beings Begin?” (www.tinyurl.com /pbwa2cd) It examines 14 myths about when a human being begins. The following quote covers just three of those:

To begin with, scientifically something very radical occurs between the processes of gametogenesis and fertilization, the change from a simple part of one human being (i.e., a sperm) and a simple part of another human being (i.e., an oocyte, usually referred to as an "ovum" or "egg"), which simply possess "human life", to a new, genetically unique, newly existing, individual, whole living human being (a single-cell embryonic human zygote). That is, upon fertilization, parts of human beings have actually been transformed into something very different from what they were before; they have been changed into a single, whole human being. During the process of fertilization, the sperm and the oocyte cease to exist as such, and a new human being is produced.

Myth: 2 "The product of fertilization is simply a “blob,” a “bunch of cells”, a “piece of the mother’s tissues”.

Fact 2: As demonstrated above, the human embryonic organism formed at fertilization is a whole human being, and therefore it is not just a "blob" or a "bunch of cells." This new human individual also has a mixture of both the mother’s and the father’s chromosomes, and therefore it is not just a "piece of the mother’s tissues". Quoting Carlson:

"[T]hrough the mingling of maternal and paternal chromosomes, the zygote is a genetically unique product of chromosomal reassortment, which is important for the viability of any species."

Myth 3: "The immediate product of fertilization is just a “potential” or a “possible” human being, not a real existing human being."

Fact 3: As demonstrated above, scientifically there is absolutely no question whatsoever that the immediate product of fertilization is a newly existing human being. A human zygote is a human being. It is not a "potential" or a "possible" human being. It’s an actual human being, with the potential to grow bigger and develop its capacities.

Myth 4: "A single-cell human zygote, or embryo, or fetus are not human beings, because they do not look like human beings."

Fact 4: As all human embryologists know, a single-cell human zygote, or a more developed human embryo, or human fetus is a human being, and that that’s the way they are supposed to look at those particular periods of development.


In a March 2010 article Randy Alcorn reported on a U.S. Senate hearing:

Some of the world’s most prominent scientists and physicians testified to a U.S. Senate committee that human life begins at conception... The Official Senate report on Senate Bill 158, the “Human Life Bill,” summarized the issue this way:

“Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being—a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.” https://tinyurl.com/y9vywtuj

The scientific facts are that a baby is a unique person and is fully human from the moment of conception. This makes intentionally aborting a baby an act of murder. While the mother may have a right to do what she wants with her body (and that is debatable), she does not have the right to intentionally, and with premeditation, kill another human being.

In the humanist quote at the beginning of this chapter, notice that humanists claim to be motivated by compassion. I whole-heartedly agree we need to be compassionate. When a woman chooses to do certain things with her body, she must then deal appropriately and compassionately with the consequences. Those consequences may minimal, or they may be the enraged wife of the man she chose to do certain things with. But, if the consequences include a human baby (from the moment of conception), the compassionate thing to do is to properly care for the baby, seeking to do things that benefit the human she is now carrying. That is true compassion. That is what the Bible calls love. Bottom line, humanism isn’t scientific nor compassionate. It is self-centered.


How Do Humanists Feel About Torture?

They are definitely against it, as you’ve read in some of the other chapters. The torture of another human being is evil and wicked.

Have you ever seen one of those grinding machines they throw tree branches into? The workers throw in one end of a branch, and the machine sucks it in and grinds it to little pieces. How would you feel if your feet were stuck into that machine and it sucked you in and tore you to a red pulp? That’s what a suction abortion is like, and it is the type of abortion method used during the first eight weeks of a baby’s life.

Now imagine there is a very large, very sharp hook-shaped knife that a machine swings through the air. You’re tied to a post and can’t get away. The machines comes closer, and closer, and starts slicing into you at random places… sometimes nicking you, sometimes carving out a big chunk. That’s called dilation and curettage, and it is similar to the way babies from 8 to 12 weeks old are aborted.

The following is a description of an abortion by Abby Johnson, the former director of a Texas Planned Parenthood branch (www.tinyurl.com/ycu6bxk8)

“For whatever reason I was called in to help. My job was to hold the ultrasound probe on the abdomen,” she said. “When I looked at the screen, I saw a baby on the screen. She was about 13 weeks pregnant at the time. I saw a full side profile. I saw face to feet on the ultrasound.

“I saw the probe going into the woman’s uterus. At that moment I saw the baby moving, trying to get away from the probe,” she continued.

“I thought, ‘It’s fighting for its life.’ I thought, ‘It’s life. It’s alive.’

“I dropped the ultrasound probe. I scrambled and put [the probe] back in place. So many things were going through my mind. I was thinking about my daughter, who’s three,” she said.

“I was just thinking, ‘What am I doing here? What am I doing here? There was life in here and now there’s not.'”


Yes, babies in the womb are alive. They are people who feel pain and want to live.

Once again use your imagination. You are in a medieval dungeon, tied to a rack. A man with a hood over his face ties one arm to a pulley mechanism, turns a large wheel, and tears your arm off. He does the same for a leg. Then he gets just your remaining hand, and then with a second try the rest of your arm. Then part of our other leg. On and on it goes. You’re still alive as you get pulled apart piece-by-piece. This is called torture... I mean dilation and evacuation. It is used to abort babies up to 18 weeks old.

Or maybe your skin is burned off by putting you in a bath of chemical poison, and you are also forced to drink the poisonous bath “water”. This is called a salt poisoning abortion. This is not compassion. This is torture… and this is what humanists support. Humanists claim science and compassion out of one side of their mouths, and preach murder and torture out of the other side.

CONCLUSION: Humanists claim to base their beliefs and actions on science and compassion. But humanism ultimately leads to self-centeredness. They are hypocrites who reject science… and reject compassion when science and compassion interfere with their self-centered desires.

But there is no lack of scientific consensus on the issue of when life begins. You simply cannot find a credible embryology textbook that disputes the fact that life begins at conception. ...In the end, the pro-abortion choice advocate must decide whether he will choose science or remain committed to anti-science [humanistic] fundamentalism.- Mike Adams, www.tinyurl.com/yapefgcr

.

Christianity is different. The Bible teachers us to love God… love our neighbors… and even love our enemies. Biblical love is defined as sacrificially helping others with their most pressing needs. So yes, having a baby may be inconvenient… it may mean making financial sacrifices… but that is love. Sacrificing (loving) another person (a baby in the womb) so that that a new human being will have life.

NEXT ACCUSATIONS: The Bible has stories about a talking snake (Genesis 3:4-5); a tree bearing fruit which, when eaten, gives knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:17; 3:5-7); another tree whose fruit bestows immortality (Genesis 3:22); a voice coming from a burning bush (Exodus 3:4); a talking donkey (Numbers 22:28); rods turning into serpents (Exodus 7:10-12); water changing into blood (Exodus 7:19-22); water coming from a rock (Numbers 20:11); a dead man reviving when his corpse touched the bones of a prophet (II Kings 13:21); and other people rising from the dead (e.g., I Kings 17:21-22; II Kings 4:32-35; Acts 9:37-40).

The humanist go on to add more examples: There are also accounts of the sun standing still (Joshua 10:13); the parting of a sea (Exodus 14:21-22); iron floating (II Kings 6:5-6); the sun’s shadow going back ten degrees (II Kings 20:9-11); a witch bringing the ghost of Samuel back from the dead (I Samuel 28:3-15); disembodied fingers writing on a wall (Daniel 5:5); a man living for three days and nights in the belly of a fish (Jonah 1:17); people walking on water (Matthew 14:26-29); a virgin impregnated by God (Matthew 1:20); a pool of water that can cure ailments of those who dip in it (John 5:2-4); and angels and demons influencing earthly affairs (e.g., Acts 5:19; Luke 11:24-26).

We'll look at these next. Click here...