Five Fake Facts Used To Prove Evolution

Evolution Never Happened | See All The Videos. Go to the: 30 Second Video Menu

Five Fake "Facts" Used To Prove Evolution

There are many fake "facts" used to support a belief in evolution. Here are just five:

FAKE FACT #1 - Everything Came From the The Big Bang: This is a claim that nothing exploded and became everything. That's impossible. Starting with nothing, there is nothing there to explode. You can't get anything.

There have been many attempts to get around this impossibility, including declaring that nothing is something, or that a vibrating energy field resulted in the creation of the universe. But, where did that vibrating energy field come from? Nothing?

FAKE FACT #2 - The Earth is 4.6 Billion Years Old: For evolution to be true requires the earth to be billions of years old. And the fact that even billions of years is not enough time is ignored. But, an age of 4.6 billion years is simply based on wishful thinking and a dating method -- radio isotope dating -- that is not reliable. On the other hand there are over 40 dating methods that show the earth to be young... not billions of years old.

FAKE FACT #3 - Radio Isotope Dating Is Reliable: Scientific studies using materials of known dates, have shown that the radio isotope methods used to measure time spans of millions and billions of years do not give true results. When new rocks are dated, rocks known to be less than 1000 years old, these methods give ages of millions, tens of millions and even over a billion years old.

FAKE FACT #4 - Mutation of DNA in Bacteria Shows Evolution Happening: Mutations result in either a neutral effect or a loss of information. Yes, a mutation can have a short-term benefit. But as the organism continues to lose information with each mutation, it degrades. Evolution requires a massive increase in new information in DNA. Observable science shows that all life experiences a massive and continual decrease in information.

FAKE FACT #5 - Humans and Chimps Have 98% Similar DNA: The 98% figure came from comparing just part of the chimp DNA with part of human DNA... and the parts were selected because they were known to be similar. But, even that 2% difference means there are millions of differences in the DNA. But, now that the full chimp DNA has been compared with the full human DNA the actual similarity is 85%... far, far away from what is theoretically possible in the available time using evolution.